LogoBOOSTBACK
REQUEST BRIEF
ODORBITAL DYNAMICSMLMERIDIAN LAUNCHADAPEX DEFENSE SYSTEMSNSNOVA SATELLITE CO.SASTRATOS AEROSPACEPRPENTAGON RAPID RESPONSECDCONSTELLATION DYNAMICSVPVORTEX PROPULSIONIMIRON MERIDIAN GROUPAPATLAS PRIME VENTURESODORBITAL DYNAMICSMLMERIDIAN LAUNCHADAPEX DEFENSE SYSTEMSNSNOVA SATELLITE CO.SASTRATOS AEROSPACEPRPENTAGON RAPID RESPONSECDCONSTELLATION DYNAMICSVPVORTEX PROPULSIONIMIRON MERIDIAN GROUPAPATLAS PRIME VENTURES
LIVE SYSTEM — BOOSTBACK PROPULSION INC — T+0 OPERATIONS

14 Flights.
14 Landings.
0 Lost Cores.

Turbopump assemblies cycling through cryogenic LOX at ignition. Grid fins biting hypersonic airflow on descent. Landing legs absorbing 20-ton touchdown loads on autonomous droneships. Built to reboard, not retire.

STAGE RECOVERIES
14/14
100.0% SUCCESS RATE
AVG TURNAROUND
18 DAYS
RECOVERY → RELAUNCH
COST REDUCTION
−71%
VS EXPENDABLE BASELINE
01 / REFLIGHT TELEMETRY

Turnaround Metrics

Days between droneshiprecovery and next launch commit. Structural fatigue margins per flight cycle. Per-flight cost index bending downward.

DAYS: RECOVERY → RELAUNCHTREND: −57% OVER 14 FLIGHTS
50403020100
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
SOURCE: BOOSTBACK INTERNAL FLIGHT LOG — STAGES B1001–B1014 — DATA AS OF 2026-02-26
0.0%
TURBOPUMP HEALTH
97.4%
WITHIN FLIGHT ENVELOPE ✓
0.0%
STRUCTURAL MARGIN
83.1%
WITHIN FLIGHT ENVELOPE ✓
0.0%
ENGINE CYCLE LIFE
71.2%
WITHIN FLIGHT ENVELOPE ✓
NEXT LAUNCH WINDOW
T−18 DAYS
STAGE B1014 — FLIGHT 15 COMMIT
02 / ECONOMICS COMPARISON

The Business Case for Reuse

Constellation operators need per-kilogram costs below $1,000 to close their business cases. Expendable architectures cannot get there. Hover any cell to see source data.

METRIC
EXPENDABLE
BASELINE
PARTIAL REUSE
INDUSTRY AVG
FULL REUSE
THEORETICAL
BOOSTBACK
OPERATIONAL
COST PER KG TO LEO
$8,200
$4,100
$2,800
$940
STAGE REUSE RATE
0%
40%
80%
100%
AVG TURNAROUND (DAYS)
N/A
90d
45d
18d
PAYLOAD CLASS SUPPORT
1–22t
1–15t
1–12t
1–20t
RESPONSIVE LAUNCH READY
72h PREP
48h PREP
36h PREP
24h PREP
COST REDUCTION (FLIGHT 14 vs 1)
−18%
−35%
−71%
LANDING CEP (ACCURACY)
N/A
±18m
±8m
±3.2m
DATA SOURCES: BOOSTBACK INTERNAL RECORDS, INDUSTRY COST MODELS, DOD LAUNCH COST ANALYSIS 2025 — ALL FIGURES ±5% MARGINHOVER CYAN CELLS FOR SOURCE DATA ↑
03 / RELIABILITY AUDIT

The Hardware Doesn't Lie

Engine requalification pass rates. Landing accuracy CEP data. Stage inspection intervals. Every figure sourced from post-flight inspection records — hover to see the raw data.

ENGINE REQUALIFICATION
TURBOPUMP INSPECTION PASS
99.7%
COMBUSTION CHAMBER INTEGRITY
98.9%
INJECTOR PLATE REUSE
97.2%
NOZZLE EROSION WITHIN SPEC
99.1%
LANDING ACCURACY
CEP — ALL DRONESHIPS
97%
GRID FIN DEPLOYMENT NOMINAL
100%
LANDING BURN IGNITION
100%
LEG LOCKOUT CONFIRMED
100%
INSPECTION INTERVALS
FULL STRUCTURAL INSPECTION
85%
AVIONICS RECERTIFICATION
92%
PROPELLANT SYSTEM FLUSH
100%
THERMAL PROTECTION SURVEY
96%
ENGINE CYCLES COMPLETED
148
TOTAL
LANDING ACCURACY CEP
±3.2m
ALL DRONESHIPS
STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS
42
ZERO FAILURES
MISSION READINESS
99.7%
SYSTEM UPTIME
04 / GET THE BRIEF

Request the Full
Reusability Brief

A classified-grade white paper covering complete reflight economics, structural fatigue analysis across 14 flight cycles, landing accuracy dataset, and a per-payload-class cost model. Reviewed by our propulsion engineering team before delivery.

47-page technical white paper — reflight economics and structural analysis
Complete cost model — expendable vs reuse across 5 payload classes
Landing accuracy dataset — all 14 droneships, raw GPS + optical data
Reviewed by senior propulsion engineer — tailored to your payload class
SECONDARY PATH — ENGINEERS ONLY

Download the Landing Accuracy Dataset — raw CEP data, GPS logs, and optical guidance records from all 14 recovery operations.

NO SPAM. REVIEWED BY ENGINEERING TEAM. RESPONSE WITHIN 24H.